We look after your interests

(+34) 93 626 47 75

Torres Sarrià, Carrer de Can Ràbia, 3-5, 4ª Planta BCN 08017

(+34) 91 794 19 82

Pº de la Castellana, 93 2nd floor MADRID 28046

Category: Estrategia

Front National: The future monetary policy of France and the EU

Yes, yes, we know that Marine Le Pen's proposals are often extreme and even dangerous, at least as far as the model of society advocated by her party, the Front National, is concerned. But any analyst with two fingers of economics in his or her forehead should recognise that the current EU, with its single monetary policy and its North/South divergences growing beyond the point of return, is a dead end. A real cul-de-sac, in spite of the Europeanist financial denialism suffered by Eurobureaucrats, who by the way increasingly defend the current EU with less and less conviction and monolithism. We would therefore do well to recognise that, as far as monetary policy proposals are concerned, Marine Le Pen seems to be handling the drift of the Eurozone more realistically. Her proposals are thus more transgressive but at the same time more courageous, and time will tell if they are also more beneficial for the French and other EU neighbours. Let's see what he proposes in this article of Bloomberg:

.

Essentially what Le Pen is promising is the takeover of French monetary policy. A return to monetary sovereignty by restoring the powers of the Bank of France and issuing new francs anchored, albeit to a basket of European currencies, as was done for a time with the ECU (European Currency Unit), Do you remember? This basket of currencies set the value of the ECU according to various parameters such as GDP or the weight of the respective countries in European trade. And from its creation in 1979 until the definitive freezing of its value in 1995, various adjustments were made according to the needs of the diverging economies of the member countries. Logical, isn't it? The problem came in 1995, when the intention was to fix this relationship between the ECU and the other currencies immovably (later the real currency, the EURO, was introduced as a 1:1 parity with the ECU). Obviously, since that freeze, the seams of the single currency have only cracked and have been stoned by seas of freshly printed money, suffering all the economic divergences that the North/South reality has shown over the years.

.

So Le Pen's proposal for a return to the Franc (new French Franc) semi-pegged to a basket of European currencies (new ECU) with a margin of fluctuation makes much more economic and financial sense than the current situation, and it is nothing that those of us of a certain age have not seen before. According to Le Pen, the French state would commit itself to maintaining this fluctuation within a band of +/- 20%. In other words, if the other countries were to do the same, the new Deutschmark would naturally appreciate in value against the currencies of other weaker economies. In other words, the currencies of the South would devalue against the stronger economies of the North. In fact, such a scenario would allow more recessionary and deflationary countries to devalue their respective currencies and revive their economies, generating growth and positive inflation. Et voilà!

.

The candidate has not yet proposed a timetable for the rest of the Eurozone countries to also adopt the anchoring of their new currencies to the basket/new ECU, but she does warn that if the rest want to continue with the Euro as we know it today, her government would allow the new Franc to fluctuate freely, without even this 20% limit. Warning to sailors north and south,,,,

.

The Bank of France could issue up to 5% of the money supply annually (similar to the increase that the ECB has been applying proportionally to France, according to Bernard Monot, Le Pen's main economic advisor). About 100 billion new Francs per year, equivalent (just for a start) to 100 billion Euros. This would finance the needs of the French economy and its debt commitments. A sovereign debt that would be redenominated in new French Francs, and which the state would buy back from foreign holders as far as possible.

.

Monot assures that the French risk premium with respect to the German one would increase but not disproportionately. He believes that the yield on the French 10-year bond would be around 2-3%. France would honour its commitments, as would any other eurozone country that followed in its footsteps. It goes without saying that the French candidate's proposal would make much more sense and reliability if it were applied by the entire eurozone in a coordinated, albeit not simultaneous, manner.

.

For all those who still think that Le Pen's proposal is yet another of her extremist follies and that the chances of such a future materialising are slim, I am sorry to contradict them, but in Germany there are more and more voices, and very authoritative ones at that, that are increasingly being heard that call for a break with monetary policy in unison with the French policy. And it is not only the «demonic» Franco-German front, but also the Belgian Guy Verhofstadt, The European Parliament's elected Brexit negotiating representative, no less, also calls for the financial break-up of the Eurozone., at least in two parts. Therefore, investors should not forget that, although today our Euro is worth exactly the same as the German Euro, the golden dream of those of us living in the highly indebted and recessionary periphery, i.e. to have the equivalent of Deutsche Marks in our current accounts, is not likely to last much longer. take appropriate measures to avoid such potential devaluations. of southern currencies and assets relative to those of the north.

Michael Burry, a manager as atypical as he is brilliant.

Our friend Marc Garrigasait, manager of Koala Capital SICAV y Panda Agriculture & Water Fund FI,has posted on his blog Investors Conundrum what is probably the most complete compendium of data and reflections compiled by Dr. Michael J. Burry, famous for his more than brilliant investments against the US mortgage market at the height of the bubble a decade ago. Many will remember him as the main character in the film «The Big Short», an essential film for both professionals and financial neophytes.

.

In his article, Garrigasait comments on very interesting aspects of the character, such as his origins far removed from the financial sector and the overwhelming world of Wall Street, since he abandoned his profession as a neurologist in California to devote himself to managing his own and other people's money. His deeply - not stubbornly - contrarian profile and his conviction that it is not only perfectly possible for the rest of the world to be wrong, but also very likely, make Dr Burry an exceptional manager in every sense of the word. As you will see in the next paragraph, his passion for being right in the long run, against the stupid market consensus, outweighs his eagerness to make money: I might even make an error. Hey, I admit it. But I don't let it kill my returns. I'm just not that stubborn. In the end, investing is neither science nor art - it is a scientific art. Over time, the road of empiric discovery toward interesting stock ideas will lead to rewards and profits that go beyond mere money-”.”

.

Among the notes and commentary in this compendium of Burry's thoughts, you will find reviews of real estate, technology and all types of stocks. Complex conclusions covering company analysis and market valuations. He talks about macroeconomic analysis, market timing, investor behaviour, mistakes, fundamentals and a very long etc. Always with his vehement vision and founded on the basis of value investing and the margin of safety. In short, a privileged mind that has permanently drunk from Graham's fountain, but who is also capable of recognising that value investing is not infallible, and that it only reduces the probabilities of failure in the jungle of the markets.

.

Here you have the complete document in pdf to learn from an exceptional master. It is not to be missed: Learning from Dr. Michael J. Burry's Investment philosophy 2016 10 18

 

Steinmeier se enfrentará a Merkel en Febrero: Auf Wiedersehen EU

Merkel no ha tenido más remedio que aceptar a Steinmeier como inminente Presidente alemán. La noticia tiene un calado político aún subestimado por muchos. No en balde Frank-Walter Steinmeier es el Ministro de Exteriores que firmó el documento de 9 páginas con su homólogo francés, en el que se sentaban las bases de lo que será el nuevo Superestado Franco-Alemán. Cabe recordar que en dicho documento oficial ya se rompían lo que hasta hace poco eran verdaderos dogmas en el seno de la UE, con frases como: We need to recognise that member states differ in their levels of ambition member state when it comes to the project of European integration”. O la inequívoca y demoledora frase en la que sentencia la ruptura de la política monetaria: The current architecture of the euro is not sufficiently resilient to external shocks or internal imbalances»…»Surplus and deficit countries will have to move, as a one-sided alignment is politically unfeasible”. También el representante de la UE para negociar el Brexit (y ex-primer ministro belga) Guy Verhofstadt, definió 6 puntos sobre los que se debe basar el nuevo Super-Estado Franco-Alemán. A destacar el punto número 4, que dice ni más ni menos: «Set up a central Brussels Treasury», lógicamente independiente del BCE de Frankfurt.  Ahí es nada.

.

Volviendo a Steinmeier, el Ministro de Exteriores que firmó un documento tan inequívocamente «franco-alemán» con su homólogo galo, como decíamos será el nuevo Presidente en contraposición de la canciller europeísta Merkel a partir del 12 de Febrero (dentro de apenas 3 meses). Además, Steinmeier se ha declarado totalmente contrario a la idiosincrasia de Trump, que prefiere hablar con Farage antes que con May, por lo que el cóctel explosivo está servido.

.

A partir de aquí, los posicionamientos políticos internacionales que parecían monolíticos, se han comenzado a parecer más al caos que se apodera de un hormiguero después de pisotearlo: Francia y Alemania aceleran su organización militar (técnicamente aún bajo una cierta supervisión de Bruselas) ante el previsible adelgazamiento de la estructura de la OTAN. Bulgaria elige a un ex-militar como presidente, que se declara inequívocamente tan cercano a Putin como lejano a Bruselas. Porque esta UE ya no seduce ni a los del Norte ni a los del Este, y pareciera que sólo los del Sur seguimos bajo la anestesia suministrada por los euroburócratas y la liquidez infinita del BCE. Gurús del mundo de la inversión recomiendan ya invertir en el nuevo escenario que se abre ante Putin (Steinmeier también está más próximo a Putin que Merkel). Y ojo, porque algunos hedge funds hablan ya abiertamente de sus apuestas en favor de una ruptura de la UE.

.

Por el momento, los precios de los bonos se han comenzado a desinflar, a pesar de que los compresores del BCE siguen insuflando en el Sistema dinero y solvencia a destajo para evitar el fin de su coma inducido. Mientras tanto, los inversores que no preparen sus activos y patrimonios para el escenario de ruptura de la unión monetaria, quedarán a merced del invierno que venimos anunciando desde hace mucho tiempo. Alemania desde luego ya se está preparando para ese nuevo escenario al elegir un Presidente como Steinmeier y a un selecto grupo de países económicamente compatibles como compañeros de viaje en los nuevos Estados Unidos de Europa. Auf Wiedersehen EU.

Democracy Changed the World: More America and less Europe.

In just a few months the world, or at least the Western world, has turned 180 degrees. And it has not been caused by any particular war or cataclysm, but rather by the result of two votes. That is the way it is, whether we like the decisions taken or not, Democracy has changed the world. Indeed, who else would be best placed to change the course of the world's most influential countries? Both votes have set the stage for what will be a turnaround as dizzying as it is unmistakable: More America and less Europe.

.

The first vote was held on 23 June, in which 17,410,742 The British decided to leave the EU, thus breaking all the schemes that up to that moment the Eurobureaucrats still defended tooth and nail, i.e. the Troika and the single currency. Even though it proved to be economically and politically unviable, the slogan of the European leaders was, until that very moment, more Europe, more Union and less sovereignty for the member states. Let's say that Brexit - against the realisation of which the defenders of an impossible EU are still fighting - opened the eyes of many leaders and also the ban on officially saying and planning such things as these o these, without being branded as pariahs or losing their positions. Because regardless of the timing and the traumas of Brexit, the break-up of the EU into at least two sub-unions of states is not only an officially recognised prospect, it is the only viable one. You can read more in «Europe's USA is taking shape«.

.

The second vote took place across the pond the day before yesterday. The reality of the ballot box was, once again, stubborn. Y 59,692,974 of people have voted for Donald Trump despite fierce opposition from virtually the rest of the world. The president-elect is still a melon to be opened, as his racism, homophobia, sexism and other Hitlerian leanings during the campaign may well be moderated to mere vehemence and political heterodoxy during his term in office. The reason is simple: from the very moment he was elected he no longer needs to ask for anyone's vote. And this will lead him to show the real Trump president, which time will tell if he is worse or better than the Trump candidate shown in the campaign. His uncertain policies have even Republicans themselves on edge. And his personal relationships with other presidents such as Enrique Peña, Merkel, May, Putin or Xi Jinping have the whole world on edge. But his nationalist, protectionist and authoritarian idiosyncrasies go in the unmistakable direction of the «More America» or «Make America Great Again» concept. And that is a radical departure from the openness/modernism/globalism of the Obama era.

.

Notice that in both the Brexit referendum and Trump's presidential election the result of the ballot box was against the odds. Curious, isn't it? Perhaps it is not that the polls are so shoddy or that the respondents are lying, but that they are pre-cooked by the establishment: Politicians and Euro-bureaucrats here; and politicians and Democrats (and even part of the Republicans) there. Faced with the risk of groundbreaking results that would annihilate the current (bad, yes, but familiar) course of the developed world, the mobilisation of the media to prevent Trump and Brexit has been enormous. It is clear that this establishment intended at all costs generating opinion among the population and not generate information for the population. But they have failed. And today the world is different on both sides of the Atlantic.

.

A priori, a more inward-looking USA and a more Europe split in two, The two sides do not have to be loser scenarios, nor do they have to be winners. In any case, one winner is indisputable: Democracy. Only time will tell whether those 17 million Britons and 59 million Americans will have led us to a better or worse world. Because their sovereign decision will affect us all, and very much so. That's the thing about influential economies in a globalised world.

Winter is coming...

This is the famous recurring phrase that most of us have heard throughout all the seasons of the hit series «Game of Thrones».

It is always pronounced as a reminder of the hard times the protagonists are going to face, but also as an irrefutable argument for taking measures, which are no less drastic than necessary, in the face of the darkness, severe cold and shortages that are already looming.

Well, we would say that winter is also coming for the financial system.

All that is missing is a catalyst to unleash the tremendous consequences of the distortions to which central banks have subjected their balance sheets and markets. (more…)

The United States of Europe is taking shape...

As we have already advanced in «The secret Franco-German Superstate project« and in «The two-speed EU is here«In fact, more and more voices are speaking openly about Europe's hard core project. Moreover, these voices are not merely rumours in the press from dubious sources, but are as significant as the foreign ministers of France and Germany, or the elected representative by the European Parliament to deal with Brexit issues - former Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt himself.

As it says in this article, This month, Verhofstadt defined the 6 points on which the new European superstate should be based. The timing for starting work in this direction has been set at just 6 months, far short of the multi-year period that some have talked about.. And the timing of Brexit, whether it is more or less agile, will hasten the path towards the creation of a true United States of Europe, where a hard core of countries will converge, ceding almost all their sovereignty on issues such as the army, a joint FBI, a government with only one president and a dozen ministers, etc. (more…)

Shall we help you search?

Cluster Family Office

We care about transparency both in management and in our own way of working. Leading wealth management and family offices company

Do you need help in capital and wealth management?

How can I avoid the negative effects that my fortune may have on my children?

How and when should I talk to my children about family wealth, and what relationship should they have with money throughout their adolescence?

How can I measure the real risks of my investments and protect my assets adequately?

Do I have sufficient liquidity and stable income to cover my needs on a permanent basis?